Karma Tracker for QA: prompts instead of validators, role-based evaluation, and inline editing

We built Karma Tracker and Karma Doc to feel just like Jira and Confluence—offering familiar workflows, permission schemes, field contexts, JQL-compatible search, and easy migration. But we’ve added key features that QA teams will appreciate:


• Role-based time estimation and logging. Tasks have separate estimates for development, code review, and testing; sprint planning is based on the capacity of each role, ensuring QA is no longer an "invisible" part of the overall estimate.

• Prompts instead of validators. The QA lead describes what a good bug report looks like in plain language, and the tracker—powered by a local AI model—suggests what the author is missing.

• Inline editing in the issue navigator.

• AI search. Ask questions in natural language instead of using JQL.

• Speed. A lightweight interface, GIN indexing, and a multi-data-center cluster setup.

• Karma Doc. Requirements and a knowledge base right alongside your tasks—featuring WYSIWYG editing, draw.io, and Excalidraw integration.


Comments ({{Comments.length}})
  • {{comment.AuthorFullName}}
    {{comment.AuthorInfo}}
    {{ comment.DateCreated | date: 'dd.MM.yyyy' }}

To leave a feedback you need to

or
Chat with us, we are online!